The Disappointed Idealist

The Rival Queens: Catherine de' Medici, Her Daughter Marguerite de Valois, and the Betrayal that Ignited a Kingdom by Nancy Goldstone My rating: 3 of 5 stars The book is very well written, like a gripping story of betrayal, war and religious conflicts, all in one family. But it has one major flaw: its major source is a memoir of its main character. This gives it an air of bias all throughout. For everything Margot did wrong there is an excuse, while the whole world was plotting her downfall. The book might as well be called "an interpretation of queen Margot's memoirs for the general modern public". Those were difficult times to live in, especially in France. Margot's family had a particularly rough deal, despite being placed in a position of privilege. The fact that she managed to survive long after her family went extinct is, of course, testament of her skills but it was also a bit of luck. Just like they plotted against her, she plotted against them. The boo...

...with the number of comments that say that the actresses that reported  Harvey Weinstein  are ungrateful bitches. ... with all the people that say "that's how it is" and shrug ...with the people that say when you call out the "blame the victim" rape defense you're spouting feminist propaganda ...with all the women that say that all the women that get raped are"asking for it" and that they "should have known better" ...with all the people that say that just because you didn't get a dick stuck in you forcefully, you shouldn't talk about harassment (not the same thing, of course, does it make it any less wrong?... Cancer is worse than getting your leg cut, does that mean it doesn't hurt to get your leg cut?!) ...with the fact that society focuses more on teaching women how to avoid rape than on telling men not to do it. It is not a compliment to have "hey, nice tits" shouted at you on the street. It do...

Romantic Revolutionary: Simon Bolivar and the Struggle for Independence in Latin America by Robert Harvey My rating: 4 of 5 stars I didn't know enough about Simon Bolivar before reading this book. I knew the basics of what probably most people who paid some attention in their history class but do not live in South America know. As such, I was pleasantly surprised by this book. I found it an objective look at Bolivar's life and career. It doesn't shy away from pointing out the flaws of the Liberator, even when his intentions were good. It also doesn't shy away from pointing out his own personal flaws - he was self-centered to a point where sometimes the good of the people did not prevail against his own personal interest (best portrayed in his interaction with General San Martin, the less known liberator of Argentina, Chile and Peru). Yet, throughout the book the author does tend to underline that compared to most people of his age, Bolivar was sincerely open-minded a...

I am not assuming anything about the number of people that actually get to read my posts. But assuming that there are some out there who don't know me who do read them, there may be some that may be irritated by what I am about to write. This post will openly criticize the United States of America. This does not, by any means, mean that I am anti-American, pro-Russian (or whatever other pro you consider to be anti-American), anti-civilization, or whatever other terms you want to use on me (some have already been used on me so feel free). What I am is anti-sweeping things under a rug and pretending nothing is wrong just because there are not many better answers out there to the question"which country should lead the world?" (my answer would be "why does any country have to lead the world" but our civilization is not that advanced). One last thing before I start: this post by no means implies that I don't think there's anything good about the Unite...

Colorless Tsukuru Tazaki and His Years of Pilgrimage by Haruki Murakami My rating: 3 of 5 stars This is the second book I read written by Haruki Murakami. I don't know if all his books are this way, but I have noticed some common points between the two I have read. They are both about bland people who go through life without actually living it. Both are cheated on and take it without blinking, setting themselves up for more because they love the person doing it. There is no moment in that book in which any of these characters wonder if there should be more to their life, nothing happening to show them that maybe they should try to get out of their environment and try to do something with their life. They just quietly sit and meditate on the nothingness their life is, without actually doing anything about it. Maybe Murakami's purpose is to have the reaction with the reader by showing the reader how routine life can just send you to bland nothingness and how meaningless life c...

First rant here:  I never understood the point of inaccurate historical movies Second rant will refer mostly to the  Wars of the Roses  and how historical vision of what happened has been overturned by historical fiction and the rich imagination of people obsessed with conspiracy theories. Official story is this: You have two families,  House of York  and  House of Lancaster . The House of Lancaster came to the throne by overthrowing  Richard II . In doing so, they opened a bit of a can of worms. Since Richard did not have children, the question was should his heirs be the descendants of an older branch via the female line (this line eventually led to the House of York) or a younger branch via the male line (House of Lancaster). When  Henry VI , Lancaster king, turned out to be a disastrous ruler, the question was back on the table. After years of conflict, the House of York won, Henry VI and his heir was killed and the whole war presumably ov...

There is such thing. Here's an example: you want to build yourself a house. You are not a builder by education so you hire someone. Then you hear a friend of yours got scammed and charged way too much by another builder so you start asking around for shit that can happen when someone builds you a house. Then you hear that someone's builder stole materials that they then charged to you. Another one's builder cut corners by building the foundation wrong and it was only obvious much later because the foundation was obviously covered by the floor. Some other guy didn't have all the paperwork in order. Soon your head starts spinning with all the advice you could get from people that built their own houses and had shit happen to them and they're pouring it all to you. The advice is occasionally conflicting. One says hire someone to supervise, the other one says if you do the two heads will clash and chaos will ensue. One says pay whatever it's worth, cause quality...